Encyclopedia Ephemera - Recent changes [en]

Encyclopedia Ephemera:Integration Tasks/IANA

EphemeraAdmin — Wed, 13 May 2026 17:00:44 GMT

Integration task created

New page

{{IntegrationTask
|target=IANA
|status=pending
|score=5
|sources=Sources:Source
|reasons=multi-source:4, explicit-mention
|created=2026-05-13T17:00:42+00:00
|updated=2026-05-13T17:00:42+00:00
}}

== Source References ==
* [[Sources:Source]] — score contribution: 5, reasons: multi-source:4, explicit-mention

== Notes ==

[[Category:Integration Tasks]]
[[Category:Integration Tasks/pending]]

Encyclopedia Ephemera:Integration Tasks/Jovian Union

EphemeraAdmin — Wed, 13 May 2026 17:00:28 GMT

Integration task created

New page

{{IntegrationTask
|target=Jovian Union
|status=pending
|score=5
|sources=Sources:Source
|reasons=multi-source:3, explicit-mention
|created=2026-05-13T17:00:26+00:00
|updated=2026-05-13T17:00:26+00:00
}}

== Source References ==
* [[Sources:Source]] — score contribution: 5, reasons: multi-source:3, explicit-mention

== Notes ==

[[Category:Integration Tasks]]
[[Category:Integration Tasks/pending]]

Encyclopedia Ephemera:Integration Tasks/Mars

EphemeraAdmin — Wed, 13 May 2026 17:00:24 GMT

Integration task created

New page

{{IntegrationTask
|target=Mars
|status=pending
|score=5
|sources=Sources:Source
|reasons=multi-source:4, explicit-mention
|created=2026-05-13T17:00:22+00:00
|updated=2026-05-13T17:00:22+00:00
}}

== Source References ==
* [[Sources:Source]] — score contribution: 5, reasons: multi-source:4, explicit-mention

== Notes ==

[[Category:Integration Tasks]]
[[Category:Integration Tasks/pending]]

Encyclopedia Ephemera:Integration Tasks/Category:Sources

EphemeraAdmin — Wed, 13 May 2026 17:00:20 GMT

Integration task created

New page

{{IntegrationTask
|target=Category:Sources
|status=pending
|score=6
|sources=Sources:Source
|reasons=multi-source:6, explicit-mention, stub
|created=2026-05-13T17:00:18+00:00
|updated=2026-05-13T17:00:18+00:00
}}

== Source References ==
* [[Sources:Source]] — score contribution: 6, reasons: multi-source:6, explicit-mention, stub

== Notes ==

[[Category:Integration Tasks]]
[[Category:Integration Tasks/pending]]

Sources:Source

EphemeraAdmin — Wed, 13 May 2026 16:59:37 GMT

Source ingestion (Phase 1)

New page

{{Source
|id=
|type=
|author=
|affiliation=
|date=
|location=unknown
|canonical=true
|reliability=unknown
|bias=unknown
|canon_status=primary
|related=Mars, Earth, Jovian Union, Ares Prime, IANA, University of Ares Prime, Blue Sunrise, Interplanetary Astrodynamic Navigation Authority, Modified Areonomic Darian Calendar, Sol Deimotis, Category:Sources, Category:Martian Culture, Category:Measurement Systems, Category:Transportation, Category:Ares Prime, Ares Prime Interplanetary Communication Bureau, Ares Prime Transit Authority, North Ares, Necrarchy
|tags=
}}

== Source Summary ==

== Document Information ==
; Type:
; Author:
; Affiliation:
; Date:
; Location: unknown
; Reliability: unknown
; Bias: unknown

== Related Pages ==
* [[Mars]]
* [[Earth]]
* [[Jovian Union]]
* [[Ares Prime]]
* [[IANA]]
* [[University of Ares Prime]]
* [[Blue Sunrise]]
* [[Interplanetary Astrodynamic Navigation Authority]]
* [[Modified Areonomic Darian Calendar]]
* [[Sol Deimotis]]
* [[Category:Sources]]
* [[Category:Martian Culture]]
* [[Category:Measurement Systems]]
* [[Category:Transportation]]
* [[Category:Ares Prime]]
* [[Ares Prime Interplanetary Communication Bureau]]
* [[Ares Prime Transit Authority]]
* [[North Ares]]
* [[Necrarchy]]

== Content ==
{{Source
|id=source-apicb-martian-mile-advisory-2888
|title=Visitor Advisory: Local Use of the “Martian Mile”
|author=Ares Prime Interplanetary Communication Bureau
|affiliation=Ares Prime Transit Authority
|date=18 Sol Jovis, 2888
|type=government advisory
|source_type=public information notice
|reliability=high
|bias=pro-standardization
|canon_status=canonical
|tags=transportation, navigation, culture, measurement systems, mars, ares prime
}}

'''ARES PRIME INTERPLANETARY COMMUNICATION BUREAU'''
'''Visitor Advisory Circular AP-ICB-2888-44'''
'''On the Continued Civilian and Ceremonial Use of the “Martian Mile”'''

Visitors to [[Mars]], particularly those arriving from [[Earth]], the [[Jovian Union]], or outer-system habitats using standardized metric navigation grids, are advised that some local Martian institutions continue to employ the traditional “Martian Mile” (MM) for short-range surface navigation, ceremonial distance markers, and legacy infrastructure documentation.

The Martian Mile is a historical navigational unit derived from one arcminute of the mean Martian sphere, analogous to the historical Terran nautical mile. The modern standard Martian Mile is defined as:

{{Quote|
1 MM = 985.97 meters
}}

Though extremely close to the Terran kilometer, the difference is operationally significant in aviation, rover navigation, civil engineering, and orbital insertion planning.

== Background ==

The Martian Mile emerged during the late 21st and early 22nd centuries among early survey crews operating around the [[Ares Prime]] exclusion zones and the northern excavation corridors. Prior to widespread adoption of interplanetary metric harmonization standards, local crews frequently adapted Terran navigational conventions to Martian areographic mapping systems.

Because Mars possesses a smaller planetary radius than Earth, one arcminute of the Martian sphere produces a shorter unit than the Terran nautical mile. The resulting measure proved unexpectedly convenient for early rover navigation and visual terrain estimation.

The unit became especially associated with:

* early areographic survey expeditions
* dust navigation patrols
* emergency beacon grids
* rover racing culture
* ceremonial route markers surrounding [[Ares Prime]]
* traditional Martian endurance expeditions

== Contemporary Usage ==

Use of the Martian Mile varies considerably across Martian society.

=== Common Among ===

* legacy rover crews
* independent surveyors
* historical societies
* some Necrarchic archival institutions
* ceremonial route registries
* traditionalist communities outside the equatorial arcologies

=== Rare Among ===

* interplanetary freight operators
* [[IANA]] navigation systems
* orbital traffic authorities
* corporate logistics systems
* off-world engineering contractors

Most modern technical documentation produced under interplanetary standards uses kilometers exclusively.

== Cultural Distinction ==

Linguistic studies conducted by the [[University of Ares Prime]] indicate that the distinction between “klicks” (kilometers) and “miles” (Martian Miles) persists as a subtle social marker within some Martian populations.

In many regions:

* “klicks” implies standardized interplanetary usage
* “miles” implies local Martian orientation or historical familiarity

Visitors are advised that the terms are occasionally used interchangeably in informal speech despite their technical distinction.

{{Quote|
“We’re on Mars. Of course they’re miles.”
— anonymous transit worker, North Ares maglev exchange
}}

== Operational Safety Notice ==

Travelers should verify all navigation units when:

* operating surface vehicles
* planning EVA routes
* interpreting legacy maps
* reviewing historical expedition records
* participating in recreational rover excursions

The Ares Prime Transit Authority has documented multiple incidents involving off-world visitors incorrectly assuming one-to-one equivalence between kilometers and Martian Miles.

While the discrepancy is minor over short distances, cumulative errors have contributed to:

* rover battery depletion
* EVA timing miscalculations
* waypoint drift during dust storms
* supply estimation failures in remote terrain

== Related Terminology ==

'''Areographic Mile'''
An obsolete scientific term occasionally encountered in pre-Necrarchy mapping archives.

'''Survey Mile'''
An informal shortening still used among independent geological crews.

'''Blue Sunrise Standard'''
A colloquial term referring to strict kilometer-only usage within the [[Blue Sunrise]] development corridor.

== See Also ==

* [[Mars]]
* [[Ares Prime]]
* [[Blue Sunrise]]
* [[Interplanetary Astrodynamic Navigation Authority]]
* [[Modified Areonomic Darian Calendar]]
* [[Sol Deimotis]]

[[Category:Sources]]
[[Category:Martian Culture]]
[[Category:Measurement Systems]]
[[Category:Transportation]]
[[Category:Ares Prime]]

[[Category:Sources]]

Instructions:Config

EphemeraAdmin — Tue, 12 May 2026 19:26:39 GMT

Session 9 fix: escape stray <nowiki> in Notes section so JSON block regex matches the right tag

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 12 May 2026
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 59:		Line 59:
	},		},
	"use_wikipedia": false,		"use_wikipedia": false,
	"max_wikipedia_lookups": 3		"max_wikipedia_lookups": 3,
			"model_schedule": {
			"monday": {"provider": "fireworks", "model": "deepseek-v3"},
			"tuesday": {"provider": "fireworks", "model": "moonshot-kimi-k2"},
			"wednesday": {"provider": "anthropic", "model": "claude-sonnet-4-20250514"},
			"thursday": {"provider": "fireworks", "model": "llama-4-maverick"},
			"friday": {"provider": "openai", "model": "gpt-4o"},
			"saturday": {"provider": "gemini", "model": "gemini-2.5-pro"},
			"sunday": {"provider": "fireworks", "model": "qwen3-235b"}
			},
			"schedule_control_day": "wednesday"
	}		}
	</nowiki></pre>		</nowiki></pre>
Line 66:		Line 76:
	[[Category:Instruction reference pages]]		[[Category:Instruction reference pages]]
	[[Category:EphemeraAgent]]		[[Category:EphemeraAgent]]

Instructions:Create/Source/Ingest

EphemeraAdmin — Tue, 12 May 2026 16:29:04 GMT

EphemeraAdmin imported Instructions:Create/Source/Ingest by file upload (1 revision)

New page

{{Instruction
|id=create-source-ingest
|type=workflow
|applies_to=ingest
|priority=high
|status=active
|canonical=true
|include_by_default=yes
|tags=source,ingest,entities,pre-linking
}}

= Summary =
Workflow for ingesting source documents into Encyclopedia Ephemera. Extracts named entities, creates a Sources: page, and links it to related encyclopedia pages. Entity extraction uses a staged pipeline: deterministic wikilink detection first, then optional LLM calibration guided by this page's configuration.

= Workflow =

# User fills in source metadata (title, author, date, type, publisher, url, summary) in the ingestion form.
# User pastes the source document.
# System extracts explicit <code>[[wikilinks]]</code> from the document and validates each against the wiki.
# If AI extraction is enabled: LLM identifies additional named entities using the entity type schema below.
# User reviews the three-group entity list (Known / Suggested / Low Confidence), adds or removes entities.
# User confirms. System creates the Sources: page with metadata, Related Pages section, and provenance comment.

= Integration Decisions =

After source creation, the integration review workflow (see <code>Instructions:Maintenance/Source Integration Review</code>) evaluates how related encyclopedia pages should be updated. Valid decisions per candidate:

; no_action : Article already covers this information adequately.
; citation_only : Add a citation link only; no content change needed.
; citation_with_note : Add citation plus a brief inline note.
; expansion_needed : Article requires substantive expansion using this source.
; contradiction_review : Source conflicts with existing article content; flag for human review.
; new_page : Entity appears in source but has no encyclopedia article yet.
; defer : Insufficient information to decide now; revisit when more sources exist.

Most candidates should receive <code>no_action</code>. Only create integration tasks for clear, high-confidence needs.

== Pre-Linking Configuration ==

PHP reads the values below at ingestion time. Edit these to tune behaviour for your deployment.

; source_subtypes : Available source type options for the ingestion form dropdown.
: News Article
: Interview
: Personal Log
: Official Statement
: Academic Paper
: Corporate Advertisement
: Government Resolution
: Government Report
: Propaganda Broadcast
: Legal Document

; pre_link_min_title_length : Skip wiki titles shorter than this character count. Default: 4.
: 4

; pre_link_stoplist : Wiki page titles to skip even when they appear in a document. These are titles that match too broadly — real words that are also article names but shouldn't be auto-linked.
: Source
: Project
: Help
: Template
: Category
: Sol
: Earth
: Mars
: Energy
: Field
: Law
: Station

; pre_link_prefixes : Honorific and title prefixes to strip when matching entity names. One entry per line.
: Dr.
: Prof.
: Cmdr.
: Admiral
: Captain
: Director
: Chief
: Minister
: Secretary
: Commissioner
: The
: A
: An

== Entity Ontology ==

These fields tell the LLM what kinds of named entities Encyclopedia Ephemera tracks, and provide examples to anchor its extraction. Edit examples as the wiki grows.

; entity_types : Type schema for LLM entity extraction. Format: <code>TypeName: short description</code>.
: People: named individuals — characters, officials, journalists, scientists, historical figures
: Places: locations, regions, habitats, stations, settlements, orbital structures, planetary bodies
: Organisations: factions, corporations, governments, institutions, fleets, unions, authorities
: Events: named incidents, treaties, conflicts, discoveries, programmes, missions, crises
: Technologies: named systems, vessel classes, devices, protocols, artefacts, programmes

; example_entities : Hand-curated examples per type, used to anchor LLM extraction. Format: <code>TypeName: Example1, Example2, Example3</code>.
: People: Alex Chambers, Maya Sato, Director Chen Wei
: Places: New Troy, AquaNebula, Arcadia, Yuemin District
: Organisations: Jovian Union, MercuryLink, Hegemony Worlds Authority
: Events: Yuemin District Unrest
: Technologies: Asterion Protocol

== LLM Extraction ==

; boilerplate_filter_instruction : Appended verbatim to the LLM entity extraction prompt.
: Do NOT return: volume numbers, issue numbers, page numbers, journal names, publisher names, citation fragments, partial strings, dates, generic terms, or common English words that are not proper nouns. Do NOT return single letters, abbreviations without clear referents, or entries from the pre-link stoplist above.

[[Category:Instructions]]
[[Category:Workflow Instructions]]

Sources:AquaNebula (Overview)

EphemeraAdmin — Tue, 12 May 2026 14:40:45 GMT

Integration review — provenance

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:40, 12 May 2026
Line 11:		Line 11:

	[[Category:Sources]]		[[Category:Sources]]

			<!-- EphemeraAgent metadata — machine-readable, not displayed
			{
			"last_agent_edit": "2026-05-12T14:40:44+00:00",
			"operation_type": "source_integration_review",
			"model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001",
			"provider": "anthropic",
			"candidates_reviewed": 2,
			"tasks_warranted": 1,
			"decisions": {
			"no_action": 1,
			"citation_only": 1,
			"citation_with_note": 0,
			"expansion_needed": 0,
			"contradiction_review": 0,
			"new_page": 0,
			"defer": 0,
			"none": 0
			}
			}
			-->

Instructions:Maintenance/Source Integration Review

EphemeraAdmin — Tue, 12 May 2026 14:16:46 GMT

EphemeraAdmin imported Instructions:Maintenance/Source Integration Review by file upload (1 revision)

New page

{{Instruction
|id=source-integration-review
|type=maintenance
|applies_to=Any
|task_type=source_integration_review
|priority=high
|status=active
|canonical=true
|requires=Instructions:World Bible,Instructions:Core/Canon Policy,Instructions:Core/Continuity Rules,Instructions:Create/Source/Ingest,Instructions:Context/Assembly
|tags=maintenance,review,integration,source,candidate,queue
}}

== Purpose ==

Given a newly ingested Sources: page and a list of candidate encyclopedia
articles identified by the deterministic candidate discovery system, decide
what action each candidate requires.

This workflow produces decisions and optionally creates Project: queue tasks.
It does '''not''' edit encyclopedia articles directly. Article edits are
performed by the batch processor
([[Instructions:Maintenance/Process Pending Source Integrations]]) after
human or agent review of the task queue.

== When This Workflow Runs ==

* After a Sources: page is created via the ingestion workflow
* When a human clicks "Run LLM review" on a candidate in the UI
* When the batch processor invokes it as part of queue processing

== Inputs ==

The context package for this workflow must contain:

; The Sources: page
: Full content including {{Source}} metadata and Content section.
: Read the reliability and bias fields before making decisions —
a low-reliability source should rarely trigger expansion_needed alone.

; The candidate encyclopedia article
: Full current wikitext, not just the title.
: Do '''not''' assume from the title alone. Read the article.

; The candidate's score and score reasons
: Provided by rank_integration_candidates(). Includes which signals
fired (stub, no_sources, linked_entity, multi_source).

; The candidate's existing agent metadata
: The HTML comment block at the bottom of the article, if present.
: Check last_agent_edit, operation_type, and integration_task_id.
: If an open task already exists for this source+candidate pair, do not
create a duplicate. Update the existing task instead.

; Relevant Talk page editorial notes (if include_talk=true in Config)
: Bias Analysis and Reliability Assessment sections only.
: These may affect the weight given to a low-reliability source.

== Read-Before-Write Rule ==

Before deciding on any action that would create or update a Project: task,
re-read the current state of:

# The candidate article (may have been edited since the candidate was scored)
# The Project:Pending Source Integrations page (check for existing tasks)
# The candidate's agent metadata comment

If the article has changed significantly since scoring, re-evaluate.
If a task already exists for this pair, merge or update rather than duplicate.

== Decision Criteria ==

For each candidate, output exactly one of the following decisions.

=== no_action ===

The article already adequately covers what the source describes.
No update is warranted.

Apply when:
* The specific claims or events in the source are already represented in the article
* The source adds colour or detail but no new factual content
* The source is low-reliability and the article already reflects the established view
* The thematic connection is real but not specific enough to improve the article

'''This is the expected outcome for most candidates.'''
A review session that creates tasks for more than 30-40% of candidates
indicates the confidence threshold is set too low or the scoring is noisy.

=== citation_only ===

The source supports a claim already present in the article but the article
lacks an inline citation for it. Add a ref tag. No content change.

Apply when:
* A specific claim in the article is supported by this source
* The claim is already correctly stated
* The article would benefit from the citation for verifiability

Do not apply if the source is low-reliability and the claim is contested.
A citation from a biased source requires a note, not a bare ref tag.

Output: create a Project: task with action=citation_only, priority=low.

=== expansion_needed ===

The source contains substantive new information not represented in the article.
The article should be expanded using this source.

Apply when:
* The source describes events, details, or context the article lacks
* The information is material — it changes the understanding of the subject
* The source reliability is medium or higher, or multiple sources converge
* The article is a stub and this source could meaningfully develop it

Do not apply if:
* The source is the sole low-reliability source for the claim
* The information is speculative or propagandistic without corroboration
* The article would require a major rewrite rather than an expansion

Output: create a Project: task with action=expansion_needed, priority based on
score (high if score >= 6, medium if score 4-5).

=== citation_with_note ===

The source is relevant but has significant reliability or bias concerns
that must be flagged alongside any citation.

Apply when:
* The source supports or expands the article but is marked low-reliability
or high-bias in its {{Source}} metadata
* The information is worth citing but the citation needs a qualifier
* Example: "According to a MercuryLink corporate advertisement..."

Output: create a Project: task with action=citation_with_note, priority=low.
Include the reliability and bias notes from the source metadata in the task reason field.

=== contradiction_review ===

The source directly contradicts a specific claim in the existing article.

Apply when:
* A factual assertion in the source conflicts with a factual assertion in the article
* The conflict is specific and substantive, not merely a matter of perspective
* The conflict cannot be resolved by noting both perspectives inline

Do '''not''' silently resolve contradictions. Do not choose one version.
Do not rewrite the article to match the source.

Output: create a Project: task with action=contradiction_review, status=needs_human.
Specify the exact conflicting claims in the task reason field — quote
both the article text and the source text precisely.

=== new_page ===

The source names or describes a specific entity that has no encyclopedia page
and is notable enough to warrant one.

Apply when:
* The entity is named and specific (a person, place, organisation, event, technology)
* The entity appears to be significant within the world — not a passing mention
* Sufficient detail exists in the source (or the existing wiki) to write a stub

Do not apply for:
* Generic concepts that do not need their own page
* Entities mentioned only once in passing with no detail
* Entities that are already red links in many articles (those are handled by
the stub generation workflow, not integration review)

Output: create a Project: task with action=new_page, priority=medium.
Include the source page and the relevant passage as context.

=== defer ===

The candidate is related to the source but the decision requires information
not currently in the context package.

Apply when:
* The article references other articles that should be read first
* The source covers a topic where the wiki's canonical position is unclear
* The decision requires human domain knowledge not encoded in instructions

Output: create a Project: task with action=defer, status=deferred.
Note specifically what additional context is needed.

=== none ===

The candidate scored above the threshold but on close reading has no
meaningful relationship to this source.

Apply when:
* The connection is purely thematic with no specific shared content
* The scoring signal was a false positive (e.g. a common word match)
* The article and source genuinely do not interact

Output: no task. Log the dismissal in the provenance metadata.

== Output Format ==

Return one block per candidate in this structure:

<pre>
Target: [[Article Title]]
Score: N Signals: [stub, no_sources, linked_entity, ...]
Decision: no_action | citation_only | citation_with_note | expansion_needed |
contradiction_review | new_page | defer | none
Reason: One or two sentences. Be specific — cite the source claim and the
article state that led to this decision.
Task created: yes / no
Task action: [action value if yes]
Task priority: [high / medium / low if yes]
</pre>

After all candidates, add a summary line:

<pre>
Summary: N candidates reviewed. N tasks created (N expansion_needed, N citation_only, N citation_with_note, N contradiction_review,
N new_page, N defer). N dismissed (no_action / none).
</pre>

== Constraints ==

* Read the full article text before deciding. Never assume from the title.
* Read the source reliability and bias fields. Weight decisions accordingly.
* Most candidates should receive no_action or none. If the majority receive
expansion_needed, the threshold is too low.
* A single source should not generate more than 5 tasks. If more seem warranted,
create the 5 highest-confidence ones and note the rest as deferred.
* Never silently resolve contradictions. Always escalate to needs_human.
* Never create duplicate tasks. Check existing tasks before creating a new one.
* The defer decision is not a failure. Use it when the decision requires
information this workflow does not have.

== Reliability Weighting ==

Use the source {{Source}} metadata to weight decisions:

{| class="wikitable"
! Source reliability !! Effect on decision
|-
| high || Full weight. Apply decisions normally.
|-
| medium || Apply normally but note reliability in task reason for expansion/contradiction cases.
|-
| low || Do not trigger expansion_needed from a single low-reliability source alone.
Apply citation_with_note. Escalate contradiction_review to needs_human regardless.
|-
| unknown || Treat as low. Flag for reliability assessment in the task.
|}

Multi-source convergence overrides single-source reliability constraints.
If three low-reliability sources independently describe the same event,
that convergence is itself a signal worth noting.

== Provenance ==

After completing the review, the calling system logs the following to the
source page's agent metadata:

<pre>
{
"operation_type": "source_integration_review",
"candidates_reviewed": N,
"tasks_created": N,
"decisions": {
"no_action": N,
"citation_only": N,
"citation_with_note": N,
"expansion_needed": N,
"contradiction_review": N,
"new_page": N,
"defer": N,
"none": N
}
}
</pre>

[[Category:Instructions]]
[[Category:Instructions/Maintenance]]